Fukushima

Järistys ja tsunami olivat liikaa voimalalle 50 sankarillista työntekijää Ydinvoimaloiden turvallisuus syyniin

Taustamateriaali
Alla on lueteltu artikkelin lähdeaineisto. Lähdeluettelon avulla lukijat voivat halutessaan etsiä lisätietoja.

Toimitus ei anna artikkeleja varten haastateltujen tutkijoiden tai artikkelin kirjoittajien yhteystietoja.

Websites:
http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/2011/fukushima180411.html
http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/focus/fukushima/index.html
http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/index-e.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_I_nuclear_accidents
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_Nuclear_Power_Plant
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/bio-effects-radiation.pdf

Magazines:
Nature, vol 471, 17.3.11, s. 273-275: ”Quake sparks nuclear crisis”.
Nature, vol 448, 26.7.07, s. 392-393: “Quake shuts worlds largest powerplant”.
Science, vol 331, 18.3.11, s. 1371: “Earthquake-shattered Japan confronts nuclear crisis”.
Science, vol 331, 18.3.11, s. 1375: “Devastating earthquake defied expectations”.
New Scientist, 19.3.11, s. 5: “The fallout from Fukushima”.
New Scientist, 19.3.11, s. 6-9: “Special report: Megaquake aftermath”.
Nature, vol 471, 24.3.11, s. 417-418: “The meltdown that wasn’t”
Science, vol 331, 25.3.11, s. 1502-1503: “Nuclear power’s global fallout”.
Science, vol 331, 25.3.11, s. 1506: “Current designs address safety problems in Fukushima reactors”.
Science, vol 331, 25.3.11, s. 1507: “Fukushima cleanup will be drawn out and costly”.
New Scientist, 26.3.11, s. 6: “Nuclear fallout spreads to food”.
New Scientist, 26.3.11, s. 8-11: “Special report: Rescuing nuclear power”.
Nature, vol 471, 31.3.11, s. 547: “Lessons from the past”.
Nature, vol 471, 31.3.11, s. 549: “Concerns over nuclear energy are legitimate”
Nature, vol 471, 31.3.11, s. 552: “Radioactive water slows cooling”
Nature, vol 471, 31.3.11, s. 555-557: “Radioactivity spreads in Japan”.
Science, vol 332, 1.4.11, s. 22: “Scientific consensus on the great quake came too late”.
Science, vol 332, 1.4.11, s. 24-25: “Pool at stricken reactor 3 #4 holds answers to key safety questions”.
New Scientist, 2.4.11, s. 6: “Caesium fallout rivals Chernobyl”.
Nature, vol 472, 7.4.11, s. 7: “A long shadow over Fukushima”.
Nature, vol 472, 7.4.11, s. 13-14: “Fukushima health risk scrutinized”.
Nature, vol 472, 7.4.11, s. 14: “Japan’s long road ahead”.
Science, vol 332, 8.4.11, s. 154: “Nuclear crisis drags on”
New Scientist, 9.4.11, s. 6: “Radioactive fish”.
New Scientist, 9.4.11, s. 10: “Fukushimas plant owner in hot water”.
Nature, vol 472, 14.4.11, s. 135: “A little knowledge”.
Nature, vol 472, 14.4.11, s. 140: “Japan disaster”.
Nature, vol 472, 14.4.11, s. 145: “Radiation release will hit marine life”.
Nature, vol 472, 14.4.11, s. 146: “Fukushima set for epic cleanup”.
Science, vol 332, 15.3.11, s. 288: “Japan widens evacuation zone”.
Science, vol 332, 15.3.11, s. 292: “Fukushima radiation creates unique test of marine life’s hardiness”.
New Scientist, 16.4.11, s. 6: “Fukushima rated new Chernobyl”.
Nature, vol 472, 21.4.11, s. 264: “Clean-up visions for Fukushima”.
Nature, vol 472, 21.4.11, s. 274: “Nuclear safety chief calls for reform”.
Science, vol 332, 22.4.11, s. 402: “Nuclear cleanup to take months”.
Science, vol 332, 13.5.11, s. 773: “Japan scrapps nuclear plan”.
Science, vol 332, 20.5.11, s. 910: “Crippled reactors get cooled and wrapped”.
Science, vol 332, 3.6.11, s. 1132: “Germany and Switzerland nix nuclear energy”.
Nature, vol 474, 9.6.11, s. 132: “Nuclear audit”.
Nature, vol 474, 9.6.11, s. 135-136: “Fukushima deep in hot water”.
New Scientist, 11.6.11, s. 6: “Fukushima fallout”.
Science vol 332, 17.6.11, s. 1368: “Citizens find radiation far from Fukushima”.
New Scientist, 25.6.11, s. 4: “Fukushima lessons”.
New Scientist, 2.7.11., s. 4: “Radioactive urine”.
Nature, vol 475, 14.7.11, s. 154: “No fallout legacy for Japan’s farms”.
Science, vol 333, 15.7.11, s. 272: “Government to fund Fukushima health studies”.
Morgenavisen Jyllandsposten; dækning i perioden fra 13.3.11 til 1.8.11.